BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:Linklings LLC
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/Los_Angeles
X-LIC-LOCATION:America/Los_Angeles
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:-0800
TZOFFSETTO:-0700
TZNAME:PDT
DTSTART:19700308T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=2SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:-0700
TZOFFSETTO:-0800
TZNAME:PST
DTSTART:19701101T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=11;BYDAY=1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20241017T183512Z
LOCATION:Harbor Ballroom A
DTSTART;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20241016T142500
DTEND;TZID=America/Los_Angeles:20241016T144500
UID:ncs_NCS 2024_sess115_ccrnt261@linklings.com
SUMMARY:Simulation in Neurocritical Care: A Tool For Assessment
DESCRIPTION:Breakout Session\n\nJenna Ford (Northwestern University)\n\nOv
 er the last 20 years the ACGME and GME programs have sought to shift the f
 ocus of trainee education toward competency-based milestones with outcomes
 -based assessments. A major struggle for many training programs has been t
 he latter portion, creating validated assessment tools that measure the in
 tended outcomes of residency and fellowship trainings. As a relatively new
  ACGME fellowship, Neurocritical Care is also in need of a consensus on th
 e appropriate methods for trainee assessment of the milestones. \n\nSimula
 tion is a valuable educational tool that is frequently incorporated into m
 any surgical and critical care training fellowships. In addition to traini
 ng, simulation also has value as a tool for assessment. Currently, program
 s tend to rely on traditional methods of assessment such as end of rotatio
 n feedback and faculty evaluations which can be based on sporadic interact
 ions and incomplete observations. While these methods have their value, th
 ey may also be subject to bias and not reflective of the trainee’s true kn
 owledge, technical skills, and abilities. Simulation offers an environment
  that can be standardized, adjusted, and provide a direct measure of obser
 vable behaviors.\n\nThis talk will focus on the current ACGME milestones f
 or Neurocritical Care and how simulation can be used to provide a more ref
 lective assessment of a trainee’s level of proficiency. We will discuss wh
 ich milestones are best suited for simulation-based assessment, how the de
 sign of simulation for assessment differs from simulation for training, an
 d how to translate simulation scores to milestone grading.\n\nTrack: Clini
 cal Practice, Delivery, Quality and Safety\n\nFocus Area: Bedside Nursing,
  Global Neurocritical Care, NCC Fellowship/Training, Pediatric, Provider E
 ducation Topics (eg fellowship training, competency assessment, etc)\n\nTa
 rget Audience: Introductory, Intermediate\n\nSession Chair: Mark Wainwrigh
 t (University of Washington, Seattle Childrens Hospital)
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR